N° 000The standard
A correction is warranted when we published a factual claim that was wrong — a venue marked open that had closed, a wrong address, a misnamed dish, a misattributed detail. Rankings, scores, and editorial judgment are opinion and are argued with votes, not corrections. When a correction lands, we fix the record everywhere it appears, then log it here with the date. Spotted something we got wrong? Flag the dish in the app, or write [email protected] — the desk reads everything.
Own this venue? If we’ve got a dietary tag, an address, or a detail about your restaurant wrong, write [email protected] — corrections from the kitchen go to the front of the queue, and we fix the record everywhere it appears.
N° 001Uchi DC — wrongly doubted (10 July 2026)
During a pre-launch integrity audit, a reviewer flagged Uchi DC as a venue it could not confirm existed — its reference material predated the restaurant’s opening at 1700 M St NW on May 12, 2026. The verification desk’s citation trail held: the venue is real, open, and documented (Eater DC, Washingtonian, Axios), and Hama Chili kept its place on the board with sources attached. We log it because the receipts beat the reviewer — which is exactly the direction the system is supposed to fail — and because a corrections page that waits for a flattering first entry is not one.